MARATTO

article · PLoS ONE

Chloroplast genome assembly, annotation, comparative genomics, and genetic diversity analysis of a vulnerable endemic species Lavandula maroccana Murb

2026Open accessCadi Ayyad University

Abstract

Lavandula maroccana Murb., an endemic species of the western Mediterranean, is classified as vulnerable and was added to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List in 2020. We assembled and annotated the chloroplast genome and compared it with chloroplast genomes of five previously published Lavandula species. The assembled chloroplast genome of L. maroccana, spans 151,323 bp, and exhibits a typical quadripartite structure, consisting of an 82,861 bp large single-copy (LSC) region, a 17,452 bp small single-copy (SSC) region, and two 25,505 bp inverted repeat (IR) regions. The genome has a GC content of 38% and contains 110 unique genes, 37 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes. A total of 37 perfect SSR motifs were identified, with most being mononucleotide repeats. Pentanucleotide and hexanucleotide repeats were absent as perfect motifs but were present as imperfect motifs at a lower frequency than other repeat types. AT-rich SSRs were more prevalent than GC-rich motifs. Palindromic and forward repeats were more frequent than complementary and reverse repeats. Nucleotide sequence diversity (Pi) values ranged from 0.004 (atpH) to 0.035 (matK), with protein-coding genes found to be under purifying selection. Phylogenomic analyses, based on the complete plastome sequences and the matK + trnL genes, revealed that intra- and inter-species diversity within Lavandula species. We compared the genomes, and their evolutionary relationships, and genetic structures with published chloroplast genomes from other species- L. maroccana, L. angustifolia, and L. dentata.

Research topics

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Genetic diversity and population structure

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345166

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.