MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Characterization of a simple potentiometric graphite based sensor and its effective applicability in sensitive and selective determination of Cu(II) ion in vegetable foliar, real water and pharmaceutical samples

Abstract

Abstract The importance of Cu(II) in environmental, biological, and industrial systems makes it crucial to develop a highly selective and sensitive analytical methodology for its determination. Herein, a graphitic based sensor modified with a Schiff base, namely 2-(((3-aminophenyl) imino) methyl) phenol was developed and applied. A broad concentration range (1 × 10 −7 - 1 × 10 −1 ) mol L −1 was covered by the electrode’s linear response to Cu(II), which had a 29.571 ± 0.8 mV decade −1 Nernstian slope. It was highly reproducible (inter and intraday RSDs%=0.94–2.12), with a response time of approximately 15 s and pH working rang was from 3.5 to 6.5. and had a two-month lifespan. With this modified sensor, 5.0 × 10 −8 mol L −1 was the detection limit and1.65 × 10 −7 mol L −1 was the limit of quantification. Over a wide range of metal ions, the suggested electrode exhibited very good selectivity for Cu(II) applying separate solution method(SSM), fixed interference method (FIM) and matched potential method (MPM). Cu(II) levels in Several samples like spiked water samples, Hairvogine multivitamin and Nutrifol vegetable foliar were accurately determined potentiometrically by either direct, or standard addition methods using this chemically altered carbon paste electrode giving a comparable results with atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) technique. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) combined with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) were utilized for morphological analysis of sensors’ reactive surface combined with elemental analysis as well.

Research topics

  • Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-25089-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.