MARATTO

article · Veredas do Direito Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável

CESAREAN WOUND OUTCOME WITH SUBCUTICULAR ABSORBABLE SUTURES

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the wound outcome after elective cesarean section closed with subcuticular absorbable sutures in terms of frequency of wound closure, post-operative pain score, and frequency of wound infection. Study type: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. Settings: Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Hilal e Ahmar Hospital, Faisalabad Duration of study: October 2025 to January 2026. Methodology: Toal 178 patients undergoing elective cesarean sections who were 20–40 years old and of any parity at term were included. Any underlying skin conditions, emergency procedures, and contaminated wound spills were not included. To guarantee uniformity in surgical technique, all CS were carried out by the same surgical team, which included consultants with a minimum of three years of post-fellowship experience. On the tenth post-operative day, patients were asked to come back for a clinical assessment. During the follow-up, a general physical examination was performed to evaluate the surgical wound for signs of infection, wound closure and pain assessment using VAS. Results: In terms of post-operative discomfort, 131 patients (73.60%) in our study reported no pain, whereas 29 patients (16.30%) reported light pain, 14 (7.90%) reported moderate pain, and 04 (2.20%) reported severe pain. In our study, there were 23 cases (12.90%) of surgical site infection (SSI) and 21 cases (11.80%) of wound dehiscence among patients receiving subcuticular sutures. Conclusion: This study found that subcutaneous tissue closure reduces wound complications during elective cesarean sections.

Research topics

  • Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Surgical site infection prevention
  • Wound Healing and Treatments

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.18623/rvd.v23.5984

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.