MARATTO

article · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology

Cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidative outcome of costus against bleomycin-induced cardiotoxicity in rat model

202514 citationsOpen access

Abstract

Due to bleomycin's cytotoxic characteristics, which include cardiotoxicity, this investigation looked at the effectiveness of costus ethanolic extract in reducing cardiotoxicity in male rats receiving bleomycin therapy. Forty adult male rats (160-200 g) were evenly allocated into four groups: group (1) included normal rats serving as the control; group (2) included normal rats administered 200 mg/kg of costus ethanolic extract (CEE) orally for 6 weeks; group (3) consisted of rats receiving bleomycin (15 mg/kg twice weekly, ip) for 6 weeks; and group (4) involved rats treated orally with CEE (200 mg/kg/day) for 6 weeks following bleomycin intoxication. The results indicated that the CEE significantly reversed the cardiological deteriorations brought on by bleomycin; this was demonstrated by a considerable increase in cardiac SOD, GPx, GSH, and CAT, along with a substantial decrease in cardiac MDA, NO, and DNA fragmentation. Also, serum, LDH, CK-MB, CK- total, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6 IL-10, IL-1β, triglycerides, cholesterol, and LDL were significantly reduced, while CD4 levels increased, and HDL declined significantly. The results of the histological and immunohistochemical analyses revealed a notable regeneration. In conclusion, CEE's anti-cardiotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties prove its ability to be a cardio-protective supplement. This may be mediated by its active constituents' radical scavenging and antioxidant properties, particularly high phenolic content.

Research topics

  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Nigella sativa pharmacological applications
  • Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100466

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.