MARATTO

article · Egyptian Informatics Journal

Calibrated stacked learning for source-aware screening of ABL1/BCR–ABL1 mutation–TKI resistance

Abstract

Predicting ABL1/BCR–ABL1 mutation resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains challenging because available mutation–drug evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and distributed across public bioactivity resources. This study presents an optimized calibrated stacked-learning framework for computational screening of ABL1/BCR–ABL1 mutation–TKI resistance. Public bioactivity records from BindingDB and ChEMBL were harmonized into a conservative binary mutation–drug pair-level dataset, with activity-derived variables excluded from model predictors to prevent target leakage. The proposed model combined automatic base-learner selection, sparse logistic stacking, probability calibration, and recall-prioritized threshold optimization. In the random stratified holdout experiment, the model achieved strong discrimination, with AUROC = 0.970 and PR-AUC = 0.922. Repeated stratified cross-validation confirmed stable performance, with mean AUROC = 0.932 ± 0.054 and mean PR-AUC = 0.869 ± 0.095. In the source-aware BindingDB-to-ChEMBL robustness experiment, performance decreased to AUROC = 0.795 and PR-AUC = 0.581, indicating sensitivity to database shift and assay heterogeneity. Benchmark analysis showed that simpler probabilistic and regularized models generalized better under cross-source evaluation. Overall, the framework provides a leakage-controlled and probability-calibrated screening approach for prioritizing resistant-candidate mutation–TKI pairs, but its outputs should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating predictions rather than clinical treatment recommendations.

Research topics

  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eij.2026.101045

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.