MARATTO

article · Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery

Buccal versus lingual mucosal graft in management of anterior urethral stricture: a prospective comparison of surgical outcome and donor site morbidity

Abstract

As evident from the current study, the study concluded that both buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and lingual mucosal graft (LMG) are effective options for the surgical management of anterior urethral strictures. The surgical outcomes, including graft success, stricture recurrence, and urethral function, were similar between the two groups. However, significant differences were observed in donor site morbidity. Patients in the LMG group experienced more early postoperative complications related to oral functions, such as difficulties with drinking, eating, and speaking. On the other hand, BMG patients reported more long-term issues with oral tightness. These findings suggest that both grafts are suitable for urethral stricture repair, but the choice of graft may depend on individual patient circumstances, particularly regarding their tolerance for specific oral complications.

Research topics

  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202602193

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.