article · European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies
The evolution of research methodology reflects a persistent effort to reconcile the measurable and the meaningful in the pursuit of knowledge. This paper examines the paradigms of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods through a conceptual lens, questioning the widespread belief that methodological hybridity is inherently superior. It argues that such assumptions often overlook the philosophical divergences that define each tradition and the necessity of aligning methodological choice with epistemological coherence. Through a reflective synthesis of historical and theoretical perspectives, the discussion challenges the notion that combining approaches automatically enhances validity or depth. Instead, it calls for principled methodological reflexivity, an awareness that the strength of any method lies in its fit with the research question rather than disciplinary fashion. Ultimately, the paper advocates for a more integrative, self-aware research culture that privileges epistemological alignment over methodological trends.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/edu/0215/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.46827/ejals.v8i4.662
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
