MARATTO

article · International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Boosted Capsule Network for Gastrointestinal Disease Recognition

Abstract

Gastrointestinal diseases affect over 40% of the global population and rank among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. ‎Wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE), though minimally invasive, generates 45,000-50,000 images per procedure, with expert endoscopists ‎missing 22-28% of pathological cases due to examination complexity and varied disease presentations. Deep learning approaches like Con-‎volutional Neural Networks require large annotated datasets, which are rarely available in medical imaging. Capsule Networks (CapsNets) ‎excel in limited-data scenarios through spatial-hierarchy inference but struggle with subtle features in complex medical images. We present a Boosted Capsule Network that incorporates dual enhancement mechanisms: modified feature boosting via intensity inversion to expose diverse low-level patterns, reducing the generalization gap by 45%, and class capsule amplification to sharpen decision boundaries and improve inter-class separation. Ablation studies on the Kvasir-V2 dataset show individual components achieve 89.3% (feature boosting) and 91.7% ‎‎(class boosting), while their synergistic combination reaches 97.90% accuracy, a 15.8% improvement over baseline CapsNet (82.10%) and ‎‎1.1% over previous state-of-the-art (96.80%). The lightweight architecture adds zero trainable parameters for class boosting and minimal ‎overhead for feature enhancement, enabling real-time clinical deployment. We experimentally deployed the model as a web-based prototype ‎with human-in-the-loop uncertainty handling for confidence scores below 0.5‎.

Research topics

  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.14419/rcjf9t51

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.