MARATTO

article · Global Public Health

Biomedical technologies in context: Acceptability of a screening tool for sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis in Zimbabwe and South Africa

Abstract

= 35). Thematic analysis was guided by Sekhon's framework of acceptability. Women showed a strong desire for devices to support sexual health and viewed diagnostic testing positively. However, acceptability declined when GIFT was explained as a screening tool requiring follow-up diagnostics, due to cost and limited availability of STI tests. HCPs and decision-makers similarly questioned its utility in constrained settings, despite recognising its potential as a potential catalyst for cheaper, point-of-care, infrastructure-light STI diagnostics. GIFT's acceptability is shaped by health system limitations, underscoring the need for clear communication, affordable diagnostics, and co-designed care pathways.

Research topics

  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2026.2657149

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.