MARATTO

review · BJPsych Open

Behavioral Addictions Prevalence and Impact on Medical Sciences Students' Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

20241 citationOpen accessAl-Neelain University

Abstract

Aims This study aims to illuminate the prevalence of various behavioral addictions among health professions students and examine their negative effects on mental health. Methods In March 2023, a systematic literature search was conducted, encompassing randomized controlled trials, cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies from the past five years in PubMed and ScienceDirect. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 19 papers underwent qualitative analysis, while 15 studies were subjected to quantitative analysis following a quality assessment review. Results The study included 9,994 health professions students, primarily in the field of medicine, aged between 18 and 23 years. The majority of the students were unmarried, females, and most were in clinical years. The prevalence of behavioral addiction was 36% (95% CI: 20–51), with smartphone addiction being the highest at 46%, followed by internet addiction (42%), social media disorder (22%), and gaming disorder (4%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the studies. A funnel plot analysis assessed the potential for publication bias, revealing no significant indication of bias. A significant difference was observed between the groups. Conclusion This study identifies five distinct forms of behavioral addictions influencing the mental health and daily activities of health professions students. The findings underscore the need for longitudinal and interventional studies to address this technological threat.

Research topics

  • Health and Well-being Studies
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.168

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.