MARATTO

article · Results in Engineering

Behavior of reinforced concrete columns made with seawater and glass FRP bars and subjected to high temperatures

202411 citationsOpen accessHelwan University

Abstract

This study presents experimental and analytical investigations on the axial capacity of 12 heat-damaged glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns. The columns were prepared with dimensions of 200×200×1000 mm and 3 replacement ratios of seawater for concrete mixing and curing (0%, 50%, and 100%). At the age of 3 months, the columns were subjected to an elevated temperature of 500 oC for 30, 60, and 90 minutes and subsequently cooled and tested. The experimental results demonstrated that the compressive strength of concrete increased by 35% and 45% at seawater replacement ratios of 50% and 100%, respectively. In addition, seawater-concrete mixes exhibited a lower rate of strength development compared to the reference mix. Moreover, 100% seawater concrete columns reported an increase of 28% in the cracking and ultimate loads. However, columns at seawater replacement ratios of 0%, 50%, and 100% exhibited a drop of 27%, 53%, and 50% in the cracking load after being exposed to 500 oC for 90 minutes. Additionally, the columns exposed to elevated temperatures showed a reduction of 5% to 20% in the ultimate load. Furthermore, the analytical models of ACI 440.11-22 and CAN/CSA-S806-12 significantly underestimated the axial capacity of all columns. The most accurate prediction for the columns’ axial capacity was associated with the analytical model of Mohamed et al. with mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variance of experimental-to-predicted ratios of 1.17, 0.12, and 9.98%, respectively.

Research topics

  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Fire effects on concrete materials

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102339

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.