MARATTO

book chapter · Advances in environmental engineering and green technologies book series

Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Methodologies to Hydrological Flood Frequency Analysis

Abstract

Climate change (CC) impacts extreme weather events such as weather conditions, temperature changes, droughts, and floods necessitating accurate flood frequency analysis (FFA) for risk assessment. In this chapter, Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods were compared for at-site FFA forecasting particularly in the context of CC impacts on hydrological processes using data from three sites of Pakistan. Generalized Extreme Value Distribution (GEV) was the best fit for these sites. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations with the Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) sampling procedure estimated uncertainty quantification. Bayesian method outperformed, with lower standard errors and more accurate parameter estimates. Safety amendments affirmed the robustness of Bayesian method for mitigating CC and flood risks and improving water resource management. Findings support the advantage of Bayesian approach that contribute in flood management strategies amidst climate change challenges. Study underscores the importance of Bayesian methods for uncertainty and enhancing flood management practices in the context of climate change.

Research topics

  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5898-6.ch008

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.