MARATTO

article · Diyala Journal of Engineering Sciences

Automated Medical Image Captioning Using the BLIP Model: Enhancing Diagnostic Support with AI-Driven Language Generation

20252 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Tunis El Manar

Abstract

Medical diagnostics Interpretation of images is a important activity: the number of images is growing continuously, and the number of specialist radiologists is limited globally, which often results in late diagnosis and possible clinical misinformation. The paper under analysis analyzes the BLIP model, which is an automatic medical image clinical captioning model. To refine the BLIP model, a methodology was designed based on more than 81,000 radiology images with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) identifiers, which were obtained by the ROCO (Radiology Objects in Context) dataset. A representative subset of 1,000 images was chosen to fit within computational limitations- 800 images were used in training, 100 in validation and 100 in testing, but with the preservation of representation across major imaging modalities. They trained the model on transformer-based encoder-decoder with cross-attention mechanisms. The four key contributions of this work are (1) domain-specific fine-tuning of the model to the radiological setting, (2) the use of standardized medical terminology by using UMLS concept unique identifiers, (3) integration of explainable AI with attention heatmaps and post-hoc explanations (SHAP and LIME), and (4) evaluation of performance using accepted NLP metrics. The model attained a high semantic and clinical agreement with quantitative scores of 0.7300 (BLEU-4), 0.6101 (METEOR), and 0.8405 (ROUGE). These results prompt the idea that AI-based image captioning has a considerable potential in facilitating clinical documentation and increasing the reliability of radiological assessments.

Research topics

  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.24237/djes.2025.18215

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.