article · Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation
<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> Articular cartilage has limited intrinsic repair capacity. While autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis typically uses porcine collagen membranes, autologous periosteal membranes offer a biological alternative. <h3>Objectives</h3> To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of autologous periosteal-induced chondrogenesis (APIC) for focal femoral condyle cartilage defects. <h3>Methods</h3> This prospective observational study (2019-2022) evaluated 30 patients with focal, full-thickness femoral condyle defects (≤4 cm²). All patients underwent the APIC technique. Functional outcomes were assessed via KOOS; structural repair was evaluated using MOCART 2.0 (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue_) scores on MRI. <h3>Results</h3> The cohort (28 men, 2 women; mean age 33.5 years) was followed for a mean of 28 months. All Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales improved significantly (mean gains: +30.5 to +51.6), exceeding the 10-point minimal important change. Postoperatively, 90% of patients (<i>n</i> = 27) achieved high functional status, though Sports/Recreation recovery (51.0 ± 48.0) showed high variability. Three patients (10%) reported persistent limitations. MOCART 2.0 scores were significantly higher for osteochondritis dissecans (82.5 ± 5.2) and traumatic defects (78.3 ± 6.1) compared to degenerative lesions (63.7 ± 7.4; <i>P</i> < .01). Degenerative defects exhibited more irregular surfaces and incomplete filling compared to other etiologies. <h3>Conclusions</h3> APIC is a viable biological alternative for cartilage repair, yielding satisfactory functional and radiological results. Outcomes are better in traumatic and osteochondritis dissecans-related defects compared to degenerative lesions.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjp.2026.100304
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.