article · Pharmaceutical Development and Technology
Cancer ranks as one of the most challenging illnesses to deal with because progressive phenotypic and genotypic alterations in cancer cells result in resistance and recurrence. Thus, the creation of novel medications or alternative therapy approaches is mandatory. Repurposing of old drugs is an attractive approach over the traditional drug discovery process in terms of shorter drug development duration, low-cost, highly efficient and minimum risk of failure. In this study Atorvastatin, a statin drug used to treat abnormal cholesterol levels and prevent cardiovascular disease in people at high risk, was introduced and encapsulated in cubic liquid crystals as anticancer candidate aiming at sustaining its release and achieving better cellular uptake in cancer cells. The cubic liquid crystals were successfully prepared and optimized with an entrapment effieciency of 73.57% ±1.35 and particle size around 200 nm. The selected formulae were effectively doped with radioactive iodine <sup>131</sup>I to enable the noninvasive visualization and trafficking of the new formulae. The <i>in vivo</i> evaluation in solid tumor bearing mice was conducted for comparing<sup>131</sup>I-Atorvastatin solution,<sup>131</sup>I-Atorvastatin loaded cubosome and <sup>131</sup>I-Atorvastatin chitosan coated cubosome. The <i>in vivo</i> biodistribution study revealed that tumor radioactivity uptake of <sup>131</sup>I-Atorvastatin cubosome and chitosan coated cubosome exhibited high accumulation in tumor tissues (target organ) scoring ID%/g of 5.67 ± 0.2 and 5.03 ± 0.1, respectively 1h post injection compared to drug solution which recorded 3.09 ± 0.05% 1h post injection. Concerning the targeting efficiency, the target/non target ratio for <sup>131</sup>I-Atorvastatin chitosan coated cubosome was higher than that of <sup>131</sup>I-Atorvastatin solution and <sup>131</sup>I ATV-loaded cubosome at all time intervals and recorded T/NT ratio of 2.908 2h post injection.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2024.2323620
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.