MARATTO

article · Brain Research Bulletin

Association of maternal antenatal distress with child amygdala-prefrontal cortex functional connectivity at 2–3 years in a South African birth cohort study

Abstract

Maternal antenatal psychological distress can negatively affect child development, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where women are at heightened risk for distress. This study examined the association between maternal antenatal distress and child amygdala-prefrontal cortex functional connectivity in a South African birth cohort using resting-state fMRI. Children aged 2-3 years who were either exposed to maternal distress in utero (n = 27) or unexposed (n = 85) were analyzed using region-of-interest analysis. Multivariate analysis of covariance assessed group differences, adjusting for confounders, and Pearson correlations examined associations with externalizing behaviors 6-18 months later across the whole sample (n = 111). Exposed children showed weaker amygdala-medial PFC and amygdala-lateral PFC connectivity than unexposed peers (medial PFC: mean=0.099 vs 0.164, p = 0.034; lateral PFC: mean=0.095 vs 0.132, p = 0.025). These differences were significant in boys only (medial PFC: p = 0.016; lateral PFC: p = 0.019). Additionally, hippocampus-PFC connectivity at ages 2-3 was negatively associated with later externalizing behaviors. Findings suggest exposure to maternal psychological distress in utero impacts amygdala-PFC connectivity in early childhood, while exploratory associations between hippocampus-PFC and externalizing behavior point to potential links with later behavioral outcomes. Understanding these neural correlates may inform early interventions to disrupt intergenerational transmission of psychological risk.

Research topics

  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2026.111836

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.