MARATTO

article · Journal of Public Health

Association of hugs with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation: findings based on data from the general adult population in Germany

Abstract

Abstract Aim To investigate the association between the frequency of hugs and probable depression, probable anxiety, and suicidal ideation in the German adult population. Subject and methods Cross-sectional data were used from the German general adult population aged 18 to 74 years (representative in terms of sex, age, and federal state) with n = 3270 that were obtained in an online survey in January 2025. The frequency of daily hugs served as the independent variable. Probable depression and anxiety were quantified using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) or Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Suicidal ideation was assessed using the final item of the PHQ-9. Logistic regression was used to examine associations. Robustness checks were also conducted. Results Hugging others (on average one and two to three; compared to individuals not hugging others) on a daily basis is associated with lower odds of probable depression (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.83), probable anxiety (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.95), and suicidal ideation (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.85). Hugging on average two to three individuals daily was also associated with significantly lower odds for all outcomes, whereas hugging four or more individuals was only significantly associated with lower odds of probable depression. Conclusion Hugging one to three individuals each day may assist in preventing poor mental health. However, future longitudinal evidence is needed to confirm this.

Research topics

  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Infant Health and Development
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s10389-025-02627-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.