article · Water
Climate change, marked by decreasing rainfall and increasing extreme events, represents a major challenge for water resources, particularly in semi-arid regions. To estimate aquifer recharge, it is essential to assess the fraction of precipitation contributing to groundwater recharge and to implement a water balance model. However, the limited number of rainfall stations has led researchers to rely on satellite and reanalysis rainfall products. The accuracy of these datasets is essential for reliable hydrological modeling. In this study, we evaluated five rainfall products—CHIRPS, ERA5_Ag, CFSR, GPM, and PERSIANN-CDR—by comparing them to ground measurements from gauging stations in the central Haouz region of Marrakech. The evaluation was conducted at three temporal scales: daily, monthly, and annual. Statistical metrics, including RMSE, MAE, NSE, Bias, and Pearson correlation, as well as classification metrics (accuracy, F1 score, recall, precision, and Cohen’s Kappa), and wavelet analysis, were applied to assess the accuracy of the products. The results identified ERA5_Ag and GPM as the most accurate products in capturing rainfall events. Nevertheless, ERA5_Ag showed a high bias. After applying the quantile mapping method to correct the bias, the product exhibited greater accuracy. The corrected datasets from these two products will be used to estimate recharge over the last 30 years, contributing to the development of a hydrogeological model for groundwater dynamics.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/w17111714
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.