MARATTO

article · Panorama of emergency medicine.

Assessment of Relatives’ Satisfaction in the Emergency Department

20251 citationOpen accessUniversity of Tunis El Manar

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency departments (EDs) are high-pressure environments where both patients and their relatives face numerous challenges. While patient satisfaction has been widely studied, the satisfaction of relatives remains underexplored, despite their crucial role in supporting patient care and decision-making. Recognizing relatives as key actors in the care process helps improve communication and reduce stress. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction of relatives of patients treated in the ED. Methods: A prospective, descriptive study was conducted at the ED of the Mahmoud Yaacoub Center for Urgent Medical Assistance in Tunis from October 2023 to January 2024. Satisfaction was assessed using a 25-item structured questionnaire. Included participants were adult relatives directly involved in patient care who gave informed consent. Assessed dimensions included reception and management, information provided and overall satisfaction. Results: The study included 165 relatives (mean age 41 ± 13 years, 52.1% female). Relationships included parents (26%), offspring (18.9%), and siblings (14.8%). Overall satisfaction was high: 78% were satisfied with the overall care, 82% with the initial reception, 74% with waiting times, 80% with accessibility, and 77% with information clarity. No significant associations were found between age or education and overall satisfaction. However, relatives from healthcare or paramedical backgrounds showed significantly higher satisfaction (85%) with the registration process compared to non-healthcare relatives (62%) (p = 0.043). Conclusion: The study supports strengthening the involvement of relatives in strategies aimed at improving ED care quality

Research topics

  • Family Support in Illness
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.26738/poem.v3i1.106

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.