MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Assessment of compressive strength of eco-concrete reinforced using machine learning tools

Abstract

Predicting the compressive strength of Compressed Earth Blocks (CEB) is a challenging task due to the nonlinear relationships among their diverse components, including cement, clay, sand, silt, and fibers. This study employed PyCaret, an automated machine learning platform, to address this complexity by developing and evaluating predictive models. The analysis demonstrated that fiber content exhibited a strong positive correlation with cement content, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9444, indicating a significant influence on compressive strength. Multiple machine learning algorithms were tested using metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) to assess model performance. Among these, the Extra Trees Regressor showed the best predictive capability with R2 = 0.9444 (highly accurate predictions), RMSE = 0.4909 (low variability in prediction errors) and MAE = 0.1899 (minimal average prediction error). The results confirm that PyCaret effectively automates the machine learning workflow, enabling accurate modeling of complex material behavior. The Extra Trees Regressor outperformed other algorithms due to its ability to handle highly nonlinear and multivariate datasets, making it particularly well-suited for predicting the compressive strength of CEB. This approach offers a significant advantage over traditional laboratory testing, which is time-consuming and resource-intensive. By incorporating machine learning techniques, especially using PyCaret’s streamlined processes, the prediction of CEB strength becomes more efficient and reliable, providing a practical tool for engineers and researchers in material science.

Research topics

  • Hygrothermal properties of building materials
  • Building materials and conservation
  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89530-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.