article · Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science
Background and Objectives: The attention given to improving the art and science of teaching methods in medical education is increasing without corresponding attention to evaluation and assessment, which are the final key components of any learning process that aim to determine whether the set objectives of the learning process have been achieved or not. This review discusses various formats of assessment in clinical medicine, their merits and demerits, and how to improve the objectivity, validity, and reliability of various formats. Methods: This discussion article was compiled based on observations and experiences of teachers of medical training over the years in assessing medical students and resident doctors. Also, relevant literature from internet were reviewed and findings from personal interviews of senior examiners in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical colleges were included. Conclusion: There are various assessment formats and evaluations in medical education and using a single assessment format may not be sufficient to assess various components of the training thus careful selection and combinations of various formats should be employed based on the set objectives, requirements, and purpose of the assessment.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.56557/jogress/2025/v19i39513
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.