MARATTO

article · Telehealth and Medicine Today

Assessment Criteria of Digital Health Interventions Focusing on Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review

2025Open accessMohammed V University

Abstract

Objective: Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) are increasingly integrated into healthcare systems and widely adopted by healthcare providers (HPs). The lack of consistent evaluation standards makes it difficult to identify high-quality DHIs. This study aims to provide an overview of the criteria used to assess DHIs focusing on HPs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and adheres to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for English-language studies published between February 2019 and February 2024, that evaluated DHIs focusing on HPs. Results: The results revealed that there is no single consensus on how to assess DHIs, but rather multiple approaches have been proposed. From these studies, we derived a unified framework for evaluating DHIs focusing on HPs, encompassing assessment criteria grouped into ten key areas: data governance, usability, information management, health impact, patient-centered care, technical aspects, global context, functionality, sustainability, and design. Discussion: The proposed multidimensional framework offers a structured basis for consistent evaluation and informed implementation of DHIs focusing on HPs. Conclusions: The results of this scoping review lead to two main conclusions: first, there is a lack of a standardized framework for assessing DHIs; second, the development of a holistic framework is needed to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of DHIs for HPs.

Research topics

  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.30953/thmt.v10.629

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.