MARATTO

article · Assiut University Bulletin for Environmental Researches

Assessing Two Types of Hydrogels on the Hydraulic Properties of a Sandy Loam Soil

2024Open accessDamanhour University

Abstract

Water scarcity poses a formidable challenge facing sustainable agriculture in arid and semi-arid regions. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to investigate the influence of two kinds of hydrogels (sodium polyacrylate, SAP, and polyacrylamide, CLP) on some of the hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil utilizing the RETC program. By mixing either of the two hydrogels with the sandy loam soil using 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3% (w/w), water holding capacity (WHS), normalized fraction of water retained (NFWR), specific amount of water retained (SWR), and saturated water increased significantly as the hydrogel rates increased. The SAP and CLP rates of 0.3% gave WHS of 0.49 and 0.46 g/g hydrogel-soil mixture, respectively. The saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) decreased significantly as the hydrogel rates increased. The CLP of 0.3% rate provided the lowest Ks (5.35x10-5 m/s) that result in low water-deep percolation. The RETC program described the soil water-desorption curves well for hydrogel-soil mixture rates of 0.0 (control) and 0.3%. The residual water, available water, air capacity, and air-entry suction of the hydrogel-treated soil increased in comparison to the control. The SAP treatment provided the greatest values for the aforementioned parameters. The available water is 3.2 and 2.3-fold that of the control for SAP and CLP treatments, respectively. Both SAP and CLP treatments enhanced the specific water capacities. Getting well knowledge with the interaction among absorbents and soil may result in an efficient and economical technology for enhancing the water management of a sandy loam soil.

Research topics

  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/auber.2024.286353.1077

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.