MARATTO

article · Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS

Assessing the sustainability of higher education institutions

2026Open accessKwara State University

Abstract

Researchers have become increasingly interested in assessing the sustainability performance of higher education institutions (HEIs) over the past decade, driven by environmental challenges, social disparities, and economic instabilities worldwide. HEIs are regarded as mini-cities; hence, having a sustainable university campus will have a resultant effect on the cities and the immediate societies in which they operate. Therefore, developing and prioritizing a set of performance indicators for the sustainability assessment of HEIs becomes imperative. This study aimed to develop weighted indicators and prioritize their relative levels of importance for the sustainability assessment of HEIs in Nigeria using a Delphi study. A mixed-methodology approach was employed, involving desk research and a Delphi study. The desk research involved the utilization of sustainability indicators that were consistently and frequently cited in the extant literature pertinent to HEIs and adapted to the Nigerian context. The results revealed that commercialized research outputs, renewable energy, campus fleet, and sustainability awareness were the four most important indicators, as they were highly prioritized. HEIs in Nigeria are at a nascent phase of sustainability advancement, and the identified contextual key performance indicators (KPIs) are intended to bolster local sustainability initiatives. A comprehension of the existing phases of sustainable development (SD) and the strategic application of KPIs would enable HEIs to optimize their contributions to sustainability practices, especially in the context of early adopters like those in Nigeria.

Research topics

  • Sustainability in Higher Education
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i4p05-29

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.