article · Remote Sensing
The assessment of satellite-derived solar radiation products has been performed over several parts of the world by various authors. The case of Central Africa has so far hardly been addressed. This study takes a step forward by evaluating the performance of three existing state-of-the-art satellite-based data products, namely CAMS-RAD 4.6, CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 and SARAH-3, in estimating the daily mean surface solar irradiance at five ground-based stations located in the South Cameroon plateau. The correlation coefficient varies between 0.59 and 0.92, with the highest level always seen for CAMS-RAD 4.6 data at each station. The bias (RMSE) is large and always positive for satellite products, confirming a general overestimation. It ranges between 34 W m−2 and 77 W m−2 (40 W m−2 and 86 W m−2), i.e., 22 % and 53 % (26 % and 60 %) in relative value. The lowest (highest) bias is seen with CERES SYN1deg Ed4.2 (SARAH-3) data when each station is taken individually. An approach for improvement based on a simple linear regression model without the intercept was developed with CAMS data. In general, the approach significantly reduces the bias by at least 30 W m−2, i.e., 20 % in relative value at each station. The RMSE also clearly reduces, by at least 30 W m−2, i.e., a reduction of at least 20 % in relative value. This work shows the way toward further improvements.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/rs18091434
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.