Assessing PlanetiQ GNSS-RO Ionospheric Electron Density and TEC Using Ground-Based Ionosondes and COSMIC-2

Abstract

Radio occultation (RO) has become a key technique for monitoring the ionosphere by deriving electron density (Ne) profiles and total electron content (TEC) from GNSS signals. This study assesses the newly deployed PlanetiQ GNOMES constellation by validating its ionospheric Ne profiles and profile-based TEC against collocated measurements from ionosondes and the COSMIC-2 mission under both quiet and disturbed geomagnetic conditions. Data matching for the statistical validation uses conservative spatial thresholds of less than 1° in latitude and longitude and temporal limits of 30 min for ionosondes and 1 h for COSMIC-2, supported by a dedicated sensitivity analysis, whereas storm-time case studies apply tighter temporal collocation and explicit control of the ray path geometry. Quantitative agreement is evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE), mean and absolute mean differences, correlation coefficients, regression analysis, and normalized percentage differences for key F-layer parameters, including the maximum Ne of the F2 layer (NmF2), the peak height of the F2 layer (hmF2), and the critical frequency of the F2 layer (foF2), along with altitude-dependent Ne profiles. PlanetiQ shows strong consistency with ionosonde profiles, with RMSE ranging from 2.94 × 104 to 2.76 × 105 el/cm3, correlations typically exceeding 0.90, and normalized absolute mean differences often near or below about 10–20%, although lower correlations of about 0.31 and 0.69 are found at Poker Flat and Awase, respectively, reflecting complex local structures and regional variability. Comparisons with COSMIC-2 during quiet conditions yield RMSE values between 7.06 × 104 and 2.16 × 105 el/cm3, correlations from 0.94 to 0.99, and percentage differences that generally remain within a few tens of percent, while storm-time analyses show RMSE between 1.12 × 105 and 3.70 × 105 el/cm3 with correlations from 0.80 to 0.99, confirming robust agreement across a wide range of geophysical conditions. Regression results demonstrate slopes near 1.00 and correlation coefficients above 0.90 for NmF2 and foF2 between PlanetiQ and both ionosondes and COSMIC-2, whereas hmF2 exhibits larger scatter, particularly during geomagnetic disturbances; additional binning by spatial and temporal separation indicates that temporal mismatches generally have a stronger impact on discrepancies than horizontal distance. Overall, the results demonstrate that PlanetiQ ionospheric RO data provide accurate and consistent measurements of key ionospheric parameters, comparable to those from COSMIC-2 and ionosondes, and can reliably complement existing observing systems for monitoring ionospheric variability and space-weather impacts.