MARATTO

preprint

Ascorbic acid and gallic acid mitigate behavioural deficits and loss of cerebellar myelin induced by Bisphenol-A in Wistar rats

2024Open accessUniversity of Ibadan

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Bisphenol-A (BPA) is a chemical component of plastics, polycarbonates, and epoxy resins making it an environmentally ubiquitous chemical. Its toxicity has been linked to several disorders including neurological disorders. Gallic acid (GA) and Ascorbic acid (AA) are both antioxidants that have been reported to have neuroprotective effects. We therefore investigated the neuroprotective effects of GA and AA on BPA-induced neurotoxicity. Forty-eight (48) Wistar rats were grouped into Control, BPA, BPA+AA, BPA+GA, AA, and GA groups with eight rats in each group. All treatments were administered via oral gavage for 21 days. Behavioral experiments were conducted to assess forelimb strength (hanging wire test), anxiety (open field and elevated plus maze tests), depression (forced swim test), and spatial memory (Morris water maze). Rats were perfused and brain samples were collected for Luxol fast blue staining. Sera were collected to evaluate the levels of inflammatory cytokines via Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Results There was no significant difference in hanging latency between all the groups. There were also no significant changes in the open field test but the elevated plus maze showed an increase in time spent in closed arms in the BPA group indicative of anxiety. GA and AA reduced the duration of immobility that was elevated in the BPA group which suggests they have antidepressant-like effects. Additionally, we observed disruption in the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum in the BPA-alone group. Conclusion BPA seems to cause anxiety and depressive-like effects which are ameliorated by the gallic acid and ascorbic acid.

Research topics

  • Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.17.603899

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.