article · Journal of Asian and African Studies
This paper examines how dominant discourses celebrating the Bulawayo Ecobank robbery on the ‘ 4 Million Heist updates ’ WhatsApp group are an expression of vicarious dissent. It draws on Eric Hobsbawm’s Social Banditry framework and the concept of vicarious dissent to reveal how the endorsement and support for the robbers underscores citizens’ anger and frustration over the state’s complicity in the prevailing social, political and economic hardships. These are punctuated by low salaries, the cash crisis, weak institutions and state-enabled corruption. This form of digital protest signals a broader demand for justice and the government’s accountability in addressing hardships facing Zimbabwe.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1177/00219096251313549
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.