article · Frontiers in Immunology
Objectives: This study aims to explore the application of machine learning techniques in assessing macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in Still's disease. Methods: A multicenter, observational, prospective study was conducted, including patients with Still's disease enrolled in the Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale (GIRRCS) AOSD Study Group and the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) Network Still's Disease Registry. Results: A total of 737 patients (age: 35.5 ± 17.8, male sex: 44.7%) with Still's disease were assessed; 11.4% were affected by MAS, and 3% had a poor prognosis. First, random forest imputation was applied to the original dataset. Subsequently, a machine-learning-driven assessment was developed to explore MAS occurrence. Collectively, regression models, an exploration decision tree, and a random forest were applied, suggesting the importance of ferritin, age, C-reactive protein (CRP), and systemic score. A logistic regression model accounting for data leakage concerns was then generated using these variables, and missing values were imputed using random forest imputation. This analysis supported the role of the selected variables, which were further combined across different clinical scenarios to estimate the probability of MAS. The highest risk of MAS was estimated for patients simultaneously characterized by age ≥ 45 years, ferritin ≥ 4,178.10 ng/mL, CRP ≥ 27.15 mg/L, and a systemic score ≥ 7, corresponding to a 34.7% probability of MAS, as well as for those characterized by ferritin ≥ 4,178.10 ng/mL, CRP ≥ 27.15 mg/L, and systemic score ≥ 7, corresponding to a 33.5% probability of MAS. Conclusions: A machine-learning-driven prediction of MAS was explored in Still's disease, highlighting the importance of age of onset, hyperferritinaemia, increased CRP, and multiorgan involvement. A combination of these features may suggest a clinician-friendly algorithm for stratifying the probability of MAS during Still's disease.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1811317
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.