article · International Medical Case Reports Journal
Background: Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) is an uncommon variant of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, accounting for approximately 5-10% of all cases. It is frequently misdiagnosed as hypertensive heart disease in African patients with longstanding hypertension, particularly in resource-limited settings where cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is unavailable. Anchoring bias, the tendency to adhere to an initial diagnosis despite contradictory evidence is a well-recognized contributor to this diagnostic error. Case Presentation: A 60-year-old African man with a 15-year history of hypertension presented with exertional dyspnea and palpitations. Initial differentials included hypertensive heart disease, coronary artery disease, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Troponin I was negative. Electrocardiography revealed deep symmetric T-wave inversions (7-9 mm) in anterolateral leads without voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated apical-predominant hypertrophy (apical wall 18 mm, posterior wall 11 mm; ratio 1.6), preserved ejection fraction (55-60%), and classic systolic apical cavity obliteration with an ace-of-spades configuration. Speckle-tracking echocardiography showed selective apical longitudinal strain reduction (-12%) with preserved basal strain (-18%). These findings established ApHCM. Dual renin-angiotensin system blockade and unindicated clopidogrel were discontinued, bisoprolol was optimized, and symptoms resolved completely within two weeks. Conclusion: Deep T-wave inversions without voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy should prompt focused apical echocardiographic assessment, even in patients with longstanding hypertension. An apical-to-posterior wall thickness ratio of at least 1.5 with systolic apical cavity obliteration permits ApHCM diagnosis without CMR. Selective apical strain reduction distinguishes ApHCM from hypertensive heart disease. Recognizing anchoring bias is essential to avoid diagnostic delay when electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings are discordant.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s605653
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.