article · Health Science Reports
ABSTRACT Background and Aims Septic abortion remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in low‐ and middle‐income countries. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and determinants of septic abortion among women admitted for abortion care in Ugandan satellite teaching hospitals. Methods This two‐center cross‐sectional study was conducted at Fort Portal and Hoima Regional Referral Hospitals between May and September 2023. Consecutive women admitted for abortion care were enrolled. Participants were initially identified based on clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of septic abortion, including fever ( ≥ 38°C) and features of genital tract infection. Microbiological diagnosis was subsequently confirmed using culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Endocervical swabs from clinically suspected cases were cultured, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method and interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with septic abortion. Results The prevalence of septic abortion was 13.0% (27/207). The most frequently isolated organisms were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus . High resistance was observed to commonly used antibiotics, whereas higher susceptibility was noted for reserve antibiotics. Rural residence and lack of contraceptive use were independently associated with septic abortion (adjusted odds ratios reported with 95% confidence intervals). Conclusions and Recommendations Septic abortion remains common among women admitted for abortion care in these Ugandan hospitals and is characterized by substantial antimicrobial resistance to commonly used agents. Strengthening access to effective contraception, promoting early care‐seeking, and guiding empiric treatment using local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns are essential to reduce morbidity.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.72062
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
