article · Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research
Diabetes mellitus, a long-term disease of glucose metabolism, is usually marked with hyperglycaemia, and often leads to severe complications despite the use of conventional anti-diabetic medications. This study investigated the anti-diabetic potential and histopathological effects of aqueous leaf extract of Sterculia tragacantha on the pancreas of alloxan-induced diabetic male Sprague-Dawley rats. Sixty-two male rats (150–180 g) were used. The acute toxicity testing (LD₅₀) was determined using modified Lorke’s method with 32 rats comprising eight groups (n=4) receiving single oral doses of the extract at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 3000, and 5000 mg/kg, respectively. The 100 mg/kg served as the control. Another thirty rats, divided into six groups (n=5): negative control, diabetic-untreated (disease control), glibenclamide-treated (5mg/kg), and three extract-treated (44.72, 89.44, and 134.16 mg/kg); were administered orally, once daily for 14 days after diabetes induction with 150mg/kg alloxan (single intraperitoneal injection). Body weight and fasting blood sugar (FBS) were measured at baseline, 24 hours, 7 and 14 days post-treatment. After sacrifice via the chloroform-inhalation method, pancreas weights were measured, histologically-processed and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Masson trichrome, and anti-insulin immunohistochemical antibody. The LD₅₀ was 447.21mg/kg. Body and pancreas weights remained unaffected (p=0.511, p=0.103). The extract and glibenclamide significantly reduced FBS on days 7 (p=0.015) and 14 (p=0.001) compared with the disease control. Low-dose group preserved normal pancreatic histology and beta cell number, whereas medium-dose, high-dose, and glibenclamide-treated groups showed islet atrophy, fibrosis, and beta cell loss. The low dose of the extract exhibited anti-diabetic activity and is the safest compared with glibenclamide.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.26538/tjnpr/v10i2.68
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.