article · Biology
The genus <i>Ephedra</i> Tourn. ex L. (Ephedraceae) is an important source with pharmacological and environmental potential. Conversely, <i>Ephedra</i> spp. still exhibit taxonomic complexity, especially for the specimens lacking reproductive cones. This complexity is attributed to its xeromorphic features, notably the reduced leaves and analogous assimilating branches, which make the species identification a real challenge. The current study provides a pioneering approach to distinguish fragments of <i>Ephedra</i> species at the gender level. This study was based on the stem anatomy and stem epidermal features using a light microscope for five species (<i>E. alata</i> Decne., <i>E. aphylla</i> Forssk., <i>E. ciliata</i> Fisch. & C.A.Mey., <i>E. foeminea</i> Forssk. and <i>E. Ephedra pachyclada</i> Boiss.) represented by ten genders collected from S. Sinai, Egypt. Anomocytic and brachyparacytic stomata, tanniniferous idioblasts, annual rings, a terete and furrowed outline, the number and width of tracheids, patches of cortical fibers, unicellular trichomes, druses, solitary crystals, and the activity of interfascicular cambium were among the distinguishing features that were found. Different statistical analyses were applied to explore the diversity at interspecific and intra-generic levels. This study revealed that the stem anatomy was not only an efficient tool for identifying the investigated five <i>Ephedra</i> species at the species level but also presented a differential key to distinguish between genders and species. In addition, our results indicated that the epidermal features played a critical role in differentiating the studied <i>Ephedra</i> species at the gender level. This study confirms the efficacy of stem anatomy as an identification approach for the <i>Ephedra</i> species at the gender level and recommends this approach to identify the fragmented <i>Ephedra</i> for taxonomical, pharmaceutical, and medical applications.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/biology13110947
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.