MARATTO

article · Journal of contemporary society and education.

ANALYSIS OF OMISSION ERRORS IN THE ACADEMIC WRITING OF LEVEL ONE STUDENTS AT A SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITY

2026Open accessUniversity of Venda

Abstract

This study investigates omission errors in the academic writing of level one students at a South African university. Omission errors, characterised by the absence of essential grammatical components such as articles, prepositions, auxiliary verbs, and subject-verb agreement markers, can significantly hinder the clarity, coherence, and academic quality of written work. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the study analysed a corpus of fifty students’ essays using a dual taxonomy framework (linguistic category and surface structure taxonomies) to identify recurring omission patterns and the grammatical structures most affected. A total of 184 omission errors were identified, with plural marker omissions and subject-verb agreement errors emerging as the most frequent. These errors were largely attributed to first language (L1) interference, limited exposure to formal English, and insufficient grammar instruction. The study further explores the role of targeted pedagogical interventions, such as explicit grammar teaching and structured writing support, in mitigating such errors. The findings not only contribute to a deeper understanding of the linguistic barriers facing first-year university students in multilingual contexts but also demonstrate the pedagogical value of error-focused instruction, offering evidence-based recommendations to improve academic writing proficiency and support student success.

Research topics

  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Writing and Handwriting Education

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.69778/2709-8338/2026/5.2/a3

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.