MARATTO

article · Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice

Analgesic Efficacy And Side Effects Of Three Different Doses Of Intrathecal Ketamine As An Adjuvant To Intrathecal Bupivacaine In Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Study

2024Open accessAssiut University

Abstract

Background: The co-administration of intrathecal ketamine and bupivacaine resulted in a substantial improvement in the time elapsed before the initial request for analgesics. A range of doses, spanning from 0.05 to 0.7 mg/kg, has been utilized in previous studies. We aimed to compare three doses to ascertain the optimal dosage that delivers the most effective pain relief while minimizing potential side effects.Methods: One hundred and five patients aged 18-70 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 20-30 kg/m2 and planned for knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive intrathecal heavy bupivacaine 0.5% in addition to intrathecal ketamine at a dose of either 0.1 mg/kg (n = 35), 0.2 mg/kg (n = 35), or 0.3 mg/kg (n = 35). Our primary outcome was the time elapsed to first rescue analgesia.Results: All groups exhibited comparable time intervals until the first rescue analgesic was requested (11.4 ± 3.99 vs 11.2 ± 4.65 vs 11.63 ± 5.11, p = 0.93). The groups examined also demonstrated similar numeric rating scale (NRS) scores during the 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours. However, a statistically significant difference was observed among the groups regarding the incidence of confusion and dizziness (p = 0.001), with a higher occurrence in the 0.2 and 0.3 mg groups compared to the 0.1 mg group.Conclusion: Based on our findings, it can be inferred that an intrathecal ketamine dose of 0.1 mg/kg exhibits analgesic efficacy comparable to higher doses while having the fewest side effects

Research topics

  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/jcmrp.2024.356862

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.