MARATTO

article · QJM

An OCT Study of Lower Lacrimal Punctal Stenosis

2024Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess the lower lacrimal measurements in stenosis versus non- stenosed punctiusing spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Patients and Methods The study included 39 puncti of 21 healthy asymptomatic volunteers attending the general and oculoplastic outpatient clinics (Group I : Control group) and 30 puncti of 17 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of punctal stenosis defined as the punctal diameter less than 0.3 mm measured by slit-lamp biomicroscopy (Group II : Cases group). The punctal diameter was measured by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in all subjects. The external punctal diameter, the inner punctal diameter at 500 µm, the punctal depth and tear meniscus height were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results The internal punctal diameter at 500µ (74.92 µm ± 60.99 vs 24.07 µm ± 34.30) showed statistically significant lower measurements in the stenosis group compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences were between the 2 groups otherwise: external punctal diameter (571.44 µm ± 148.78 vs 545.23 µm ± 201.72), punctal depth (824.49 µm ± 354.14 vs 707.63 µm ± 552.80),. (and tear meniscus height (356.19 µm ± 166.83 vs 403.57 µm ± 244.24 Conclusion : Anterior segment optical coherence tomography provides a superior ability to assess the patency of the proximal lacrimal drainage system over the regular routine slit lamp examination. This is probably useful in diagnosis of cases of epiphora with externally non-stenosed puncti and distally patent passages.

Research topics

  • Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
  • Ocular Infections and Treatments
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.628

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.