MARATTO

article · Results in Engineering

An experimental assessment of five distinct solar distiller designs' thermo-economic performance

202418 citationsOpen accessPharos University in Alexandria

Abstract

• SPSS, CYSS, DSSS and PSS has been tested with and without modifications. • SPSS, CYSS DSSS and PSS are 115 %, 105 % 31 % and 68 % more productive than CSS. • The production of SPSS with reflector increased by 188 %. • With the addition of PCM-Ag, the output of SPSS with reflector improved by 230 %. • The yield of SPSS with reflector, fan, and condenser is 253 % higher than CSS. This study evaluates five solar still (SS) designs—spherical, cylindrical, pyramid, conventional, and double-slope—to determine the most efficient configuration for freshwater production at a specific test location. In initial testing, the unmodified SS designs were compared to a traditional distiller. Modifications were then made to the spherical SS by adding external reflectors, followed by integrating phase change materials (PCM) with silver nanomaterials. The final configuration tested included the spherical SS with reflectors, fans, and external condensers. Results showed substantial productivity increases over the conventional solar still (CSS), with production enhancements of 115 %, 105 %, 68 %, and 31 % for the spherical, cylindrical, pyramid, and double-slope SS designs, respectively. The spherical SS with optimized Nano-PCM and reflectors achieved a 230 % increase over CSS (10,420 kg/m² vs. 3150 kg/m²). The best-performing configuration, combining a fan, condenser, and reflectors, yielded a 253 % improvement, with daily outputs of 11.3 kg/m² compared to 3.2 kg/m² for CSS. Economic analysis revealed that the optimized spherical SS configuration reduced the cost of freshwater production to 0.01 $/kg, significantly lower than the conventional SS cost of 0.024 $/kg.

Research topics

  • Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
  • Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
  • Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103537

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.