article · Informatica
Every employee in the company that deals with data needs to have clean, noise-free data. Since data warehouses store and update enormous amounts of data from several sources, there is a potential that some of those references may contain inaccurate data. Due to the noise, inefficacy, and poor characterization of the vast amount of accessible data, as well as the ensuing insensitivity and inefficiencies of human data cleaning and labeling, the presentation of the data has become ambiguous, and the assessment of the information has become difficult. A hole in the creation of a better data analysis method was identified. This helped to guide the creation of a Python script for automatically cleaning and labeling data. The first step in the strategy used in this study to accomplish its goals and objectives was to obtain a financial dataset from the top database, "Kaggle". Create a machine learning (ML) approach in Python that intends to automate the financial dataset cleaning. This covers ingesting data, addressing incomplete data, addressing anomalies, one-hot wrapping and label encoding, extracting date and time values, and data normalization. Implementing an unsupervised machine learning method that attempts to automate financial dataset labeling (k-means). Using the method includes the elbow principle, k-means clustering, data modeling of "age" versus "arrival," dimensionality reductions, computer vision, and dataset categorizing using the groupings. Empirical assessment of the cleaned and labeled automated trading dataset utilizing a comparison of the cleaned dataset before and after PCA adoption. The results show that the developed ML technique not only improved the performance of the audit data used in this study, but it also classified the data after cleaning it and removing the unpleasant section and incomplete data, as shown by the k-means segmentation result and grouping by PCA
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.31449/inf.v47i6.4474
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.