MARATTO

article · Asian Journal of Research in Biochemistry

Alterations in Renal Function Markers and Electrolyte Balance in Hypertensive Naval Personnel Attending Naval Medical Center Sapele, Nigeria

2026Open accessImo State University

Abstract

Background: Hypertension can influence renal filtration and electrolyte homeostasis, making assessment of renal function clinically relevant in occupational groups with cardiovascular risk. Objective: To evaluate renal function markers and electrolyte balance in hypertensive male naval personnel attending Naval Medical Center Sapele, Nigeria. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study included 60 hypertensive and 60 age-matched normotensive male naval personnel. Serum creatinine and urea were assessed as renal function markers, while sodium, potassium, and chloride were evaluated as electrolytes. Group differences were examined using independent t-tests, and Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess relationships between renal function markers and electrolytes, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Hypertensive personnel had higher serum creatinine concentrations than normotensive controls (102.25 ± 5.57 vs. 93.06 ± 12.30 µmol/L; p = 0.001) and higher urea concentrations (5.03 ± 1.09 vs. 4.26 ± 1.15 mmol/L; p = 0.001). Serum sodium was also modestly higher in the hypertensive group (139.8 ± 3.2 vs. 138.5 ± 2.9 mmol/L; p = 0.023). Potassium and chloride did not differ significantly between groups. Within the hypertensive group, renal function markers were not significantly correlated with sodium, potassium, or chloride. Conclusion: Hypertensive naval personnel showed higher creatinine, urea, and sodium values than normotensive personnel. These findings support routine monitoring of renal function and electrolyte status in this population.

Research topics

  • Sodium Intake and Health
  • Renal function and acid-base balance
  • Potassium and Related Disorders

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.9734/ajrb/2026/v16i5516

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.