MARATTO

article · Global Social Policy

Agency and shock-responsive social protection: Informal traders and the Social Relief of Distress grant in South Africa

Abstract

Across many countries, the design of social protection for informal workers – particularly in response to shocks – is often shaped by assumptions about their limited agency. This article examines how the COVID-19 pandemic and the introduction of South Africa’s Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant influenced the agency of informal traders. The SRD was the country’s first cash transfer made available to able-bodied, working-age adults. Drawing on structuration theory, the article explores how informal traders responded to crisis within a constrained structural environment. The findings challenge prevailing narratives that depict informal workers as passive recipients or deviant economic actors. Instead, traders demonstrated a strong agentic identity and a desire to be recognised as legitimate workers. The article argues that shock-responsive social protection can support informal workers’ own efforts to sustain livelihoods, if it offers stable, appropriately designed benefits linked to broader labour protections. These insights have broader relevance for inclusive global social protection policy.

Research topics

  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Global trade, sustainability, and social impact

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/14680181261432801

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.