MARATTO

article · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems

Advancing Steganography Through Fuzzy Gradient Selection and Comparative Evaluation

Abstract

Problem: Contemporary steganography techniques like conventional Least Significant Bit (LSB) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) often exhibit a fundamental trade-off between payload capacity, imperceptibility, and robustness against signal processing attacks. Objective: This work proposes an adaptive steganographic framework that employs intelligent region selection to optimize these trade-offs, minimizing visual artifacts while maintaining data integrity against common distortions. Approaches: We introduce a Fuzzy Gradient Selection (FGS) model based on a fuzzy inference system to select the best regions for embedding within a cover image. The fuzzy membership parameters are then automatically refined to produce optimized embeddings using a Genetic Algorithm (GA). Making the embedding process tailored to each image material. Results: Experimental comparisons indicate that the GA-optimized FGS scheme achieves excellent imperceptibility, registering a Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of 65.92 dB, Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) of 0.9999, and only 1.66% of pixels modified at 0.10 bits-per-pixel payload. While payload recovery is ideal under non-attack conditions, the FGS scheme shows considerable resistance to malicious JPEG compression and Gaussian attacks with Bit Error Rates between 0.45 and 0.62 under attack. Conclusion: The results prove that the FGS framework is highly effective when the imperceptibility and statistical undetectability are primary issues. Future work may merge error-correcting codes with spatial-frequency domain methods to enhance robustness while preserving the visual quality achieved by our method.

Research topics

  • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Digital Media Forensic Detection

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/18758967261421353

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.