article · Scientific Reports
Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of alkali-activated calcium bentonite clay sourced from the El Alamein region in northern Egypt for extracting toxic heavy metals from synthetic wastewater. Raw clay underwent crushing, ball milling, magnetic separation, mild acid treatment, and activation using sodium carbonate. Mineral analysis confirmed montmorillonite as the primary component in both untreated and activated samples. Testing examined how pH, temperature, clay dosage, contact time, and initial metal concentrations affected the removal of copper, lead, and nickel. Activation noticeably enhanced removal performance. Under optimal conditions at neutral pH, the activated bentonite demonstrated maximum uptake capacities of 14 mg/g for copper, 13 mg/g for lead, and 12.2 mg/g for nickel, consistently outperforming the natural material. The process aligned with monolayer chemisorption behaviour and was found to be spontaneous and endothermic.
Contamination of water by heavy metals like lead, copper, and nickel presents serious environmental and public health hazards. Finding low-cost, abundant natural minerals that can be chemically modified to capture these pollutants provides a practical pathway for cleaner water. Demonstrating that locally available Egyptian bentonite can be upgraded into an effective adsorbent supports more accessible wastewater treatment approaches.
This research could enable the production of low-cost adsorbents for industrial effluent treatment, particularly for facilities discharging heavy metal waste. Potential users include municipal or industrial wastewater plant operators. Given that testing was restricted to synthetic wastewater at laboratory scale, the technology represents early-stage research requiring further validation in complex, real-world industrial effluents before commercial deployment.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Abstract This study evaluates the efficiency of alkali-activated Egyptian calcium bentonite, obtained from the El Alamein region in northern Egypt, for the removal of copper (Cu 2⁺ ), lead (Pb 2⁺ ), and nickel (Ni 2⁺ ) from synthetic wastewater. The bentonite samples underwent a series of preparation steps, including crushing, ball milling, magnetic separation, acid treatment with 0.1N acetic acid, and alkali activation using 5% sodium carbonate (Na 2 CO 3 ). Various analytical techniques, such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), cation exchange capacity (CEC) measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and free swelling analysis, were employed to characterize the materials. Absorption experiments were performed to examine the effects of pH, temperature, starting metal concentration, bentonite dose, and contact duration on heavy metal removal. The characterization results confirmed that montmorillonite was the predominant mineral in both the natural and activated bentonite samples. Adsorption studies indicated a significant improvement in heavy metal removal efficiency after activation. Under optimal conditions (pH 7, 1 g/L adsorbent dose, 120 min contact time, 20 mg/L initial metal concentration, and 20 °C), the maximum adsorption capacities of the activated bentonite were determined as 14 ± 0.03 mg/g for Cu 2+ , 13 ± 0.04 mg/g for Pb 2+ , and 12.2 ± 0.05 mg/g for Ni 2+ , exceeding those of the natural bentonite, which recorded capacities of 9.2 ± 0.04 mg/g, 9 ± 0.03 mg/g, and 8 ± 0.02 mg/g, respectively. Adsorption equilibrium data according to the Langmuir isotherm model, exhibiting high correlation values (R 2 = 0.9979 for Cu 2+ , 0.9972 for Pb 2+ , and 0.9973 for Ni 2+ ). Moreover, kinetic modeling demonstrated that the adsorption followed a pseudo-second-order mechanism, suggesting an intense chemisorption process. The thermodynamic analysis indicated that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic, demonstrating enhanced adsorption at higher temperatures.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-95184-7
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
