MARATTO

article · International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation

Adoption of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices among project managers in the Ghanaian construction industry

Abstract

Purpose One of the biggest challenges in the construction industry is finding a way to maintain steady growth whilst generating less waste and utilizing fewer natural resources. The adoption of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices aids in curbing this major challenge. This study examines the adoption of ESG practices among project managers in the Ghanaian Construction Industry. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a quantitative research approach with a survey strategy. A structured questionnaire based on a literature review of 24 ESG practices, 10 barriers and 10 enablers, was administered to 72 project managers working in construction firms in Ghana. The data retrieved were analysed descriptively and inferentially. Findings The findings revealed that social sustainability practices had the highest overall adoption frequency among Ghanaian construction project managers, followed by governance and environmental practices. The findings further revealed that health and safety, stakeholder engagement and ethical behaviour emerged as the most frequently adopted ESG practices. Financial constraints, data limitations and lack of leadership and policy support were identified as the most critical barriers to ESG adoption. In addition, establishing ESG information systems, integrating ESG into corporate strategy and leveraging technology are the top-ranked strategies for enhancing the adoption of ESG practices among project managers in Ghana. Originality/value This study contributes to existing literature on ESG adoption within a developing country context. The findings offer practical value for benchmarking ESG performance, designing targeted interventions and fostering an enabling ecosystem for sustainability.

Research topics

  • Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1108/ijbpa-07-2025-0171

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.