article · Climate Risk Management
A systematic review of 100 studies published between 2001 and 2021 examines the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices across the Ethiopian highlands. Most research focuses on the Amhara, Oromiya, and Southern Nations and Nationalities regions. Soil and water conservation represents the most adopted practice at an average rate of 61.5 percent, followed by integrated soil fertility management at 56.5 percent and agroforestry at 48.8 percent. Farmers who adopt these techniques experience higher crop yields, increased land productivity, improved farm incomes, greater food availability, and decreased household poverty. However, widespread uptake is hindered primarily by socioeconomic limitations and a lack of knowledge, alongside labour shortages and poor market access. Significant gaps remain in the literature, notably a deficit of nationwide analyses, limited work in drought-prone areas, and inconsistent integration of gender considerations and quantified socioeconomic evaluations.
Climate change directly threatens agricultural resilience and food security. Understanding which climate-smart practices work, and the exact constraints that prevent smallholders from using them, helps policymakers, development agencies, and agricultural organisations design interventions that effectively boost productivity and alleviate poverty in vulnerable rural communities.
As a synthesis of existing literature, this work is at a policy and research stage rather than near commercial deployment. However, it indicates clear market and operational requirements for agribusinesses and agritech providers. Specific opportunities exist for developers of remote-sensing tools, artificial intelligence modelling, and agricultural weather index-based insurance to tackle information barriers, climate risks, and market access challenges faced by Ethiopian farmers.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
To ensure climate-resilient food and other production systems, countries must adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate-change. Adopting climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAPs) will significantly contribute to such adaptation and mitigation. In global, regional, and African contexts, Ethiopia represents a useful case study from which much can be learned. Therefore, the fourfold objectives of this Ethiopia-focused review were to i) synthesize adoption studies of more than seven CSAPs; ii) examine their adoption status, including gender considerations, socioeconomic benefits, and constraints to CSAP adoption; iii) identify gaps in the current CSAPs adoption literature, and iv) highlight future CSAP research and policy directions. Following a systematic literature review procedure, 100 articles published between 2001 and 2021 on adoption of CSAPs in Ethiopia were reviewed. Although all the publications were about the highlands of Ethiopia, over 80% came from the regions of Amhara, Oromiya, and South Nations and Nationalities. The most-adopted practice was soil and water conservation (SWC), with a mean adoption rate of 61.5%, followed by integrated soil fertility management, and agroforestry with mean adoption rates of 56.5% and 48.8%, respectively. Gender analysis was integrated in the studies at varying levels, including in all improved livestock management initiatives; just over half the SWC initiatives; and over 75% of the remaining five practices. Quantified socioeconomic benefits were reported in only 46 papers. Greater farm income; increased land productivity; higher yields; increased food availability; and reduced household poverty were among the reported benefits of adopters compared to their counterparts. Among the aggregated constraints, socioeconomic factors and knowledge/awareness were ranked the two highest, followed by labor shortage and limited market access. The study highlighted research gaps, especially a lack of national-scale studies and studies focusing on drought-prone regions. Additionally, 37% and 46% of the studies respectively, didn’t consider i) gender, and ii) analysis of socioeconomic benefits of CSAP adoption. This Ethiopian review reveals a need to fill research gaps in methodologies and practices, and at all levels in all regions, particularly in drought-prone regions. It identifies those CSAPs which could contribute more to addressing climate change, and emphasizes the need for greater gender inclusion. Policy-related actions should i) boost CSAP-related knowledge; ii) support optimizing their socioeconomic benefits; iii) address labor shortages; iv) improve access to irrigation, markets; credit, and farmers’ social organizations; and v) strengthen land tenure. In future, deploying remote-sensing technology, artificial intelligence and modelling approaches, and implementing Agricultural Weather Index-Based Insurance may also support CSAPs adoption.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100628
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
