MARATTO

article · Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Adjusting ram semen preservation: Exploring the impact of oxygen exposure during liquid storage

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of storage conditions on the quality of chilled ram semen stored at 4°C for 48 h, comparing aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Ejaculates from INRA180 rams were collected and stored under both conditions, with assessments at 0-, 24-, and 48-h intervals. Various sperm parameters were examined, including motility, velocity, viability, morphology, membrane integrity, and lipid peroxidation. Results showed that storage duration significantly impacted sperm quality, leading to a gradual decline from 0 to 24 h and 24 to 48 h. Notably, after the initial 24 h, progressive motility (PM) and membrane integrity (MI) demonstrated distinct responses to storage conditions. Anaerobic storage consistently improved PM and MI values compared to aerobic storage between 24 and 48 h. Anaerobic conditions also enhanced viability and reduced abnormality at the 48-h mark. Total motility remained stable throughout storage. Velocity parameters (VCL: curvilinear velocity; VSL: straight velocity and VAP: velocity average path) exhibited differences between the 24- and 48-h intervals, with anaerobic storage resulting in higher VAP and VSL values. Moreover, lipid peroxidation exhibited a progressive increase from 0 to 24 h and 24 to 48 h, independent of storage conditions. Remarkably, anaerobic storage consistently yielded lower lipid peroxidation levels compared to aerobic storage, regardless of storage duration. In conclusion, this study highlights that the anaerobic storage proved advantageous for chilled ram semen quality, particularly after the initial 24 h.

Research topics

  • Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/rda.14618

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.