MARATTO

article · Earth system science data

ADHI: the African Database of Hydrometric Indices (1950–2018)

202154 citationsOpen accessUniversité de Kinshasa (UNIKIN)

In plain language

Africa currently has a very low density of hydrometric stations measuring river discharge, despite having had a substantial network operating until the 1970s. To address data gaps, the African Database of Hydrometric Indices (ADHI) gathers quality-controlled hydrometric indices and hydrological signatures derived from multiple data sources. The compilation covers 1,466 stations across most of the continent's climatic zones, with each station providing at least ten years of daily discharge data between 1950 and 2018. Across the network, the average observation record spans 33 years, and 131 stations contain complete records extending beyond 50 years. The database provides metrics representing average flow characteristics alongside extreme conditions, such as low flows and floods. Accessible to the scientific community, the resource is designed to receive regular updates that will incorporate additional monitoring stations and longer river discharge time series.

Key takeaways

  • The ADHI compiles quality-controlled hydrometric indices and hydrological signatures across 1,466 African stations for the period 1950 to 2018.
  • Every station in the dataset features at least 10 years of daily discharge measurements, with an average record length of 33 years.
  • Complete records spanning more than 50 years are available for 131 monitoring stations across the continent.
  • The dataset encompasses most African climatic regions and provides data on mean flow properties as well as flood and drought extremes.
  • The repository is accessible for download and is scheduled for regular updates with expanded station coverage and longer time series.

Why it matters

Understanding water availability, drought patterns, and flood risks across Africa requires reliable long-term river flow measurements. Because operational monitoring networks have sharply declined since the 1970s, this centralised and quality-checked database restores access to decades of historical river discharge information, helping analysts examine critical water trends across diverse climatic environments.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract presents an openly accessible scientific dataset rather than a commercial product. While hydrological modellers, infrastructure planners, and environmental risk assessors could draw on its discharge metrics for flood and drought analysis, the database is configured primarily as an open research resource, and the abstract does not indicate an explicit commercialisation pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract. The African continent is probably the one with the lowest density of hydrometric stations currently measuring river discharge despite the fact that the number of operating stations was quite important until the 1970s. This new African Database of Hydrometric Indices (ADHI) provides a wide range of hydrometric indices and hydrological signatures computed from different sources of data after a quality control. It includes 1466 stations with at least 10 years of daily discharge data over the period 1950–2018. The average record length is 33 years, and 131 stations have complete records over 50 years. With this new dataset spanning most climatic regions of the African continent, several hydrometric indices have been computed, representing mean flow characteristics and extremes (low flows and floods), and are accessible to the scientific community. The database will be updated on a regular basis to include more hydrometric stations and longer time series of river discharge. The ADHI is available for download at: https://doi.org/10.23708/LXGXQ9 (Tramblay and Rouché, 2020).

Research topics

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5194/essd-13-1547-2021

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.