article · AIP Advances
By extending the Heimburg–Jackson soliton model for neural signals that considers the effects of higher-order nonlinearities, the dynamics of modulated waves characterizing electromechanical density pulses is described in the form of soliton-like pulse signals representing nerve impulses, well-known as action potential pulses (Appulses). The investigation is performed both analytically and numerically, where a comprehensive picture of higher-order nonlinearities effects on the generation and evolution of nerve impulses is provided. Within the framework of a multiple-scale-expansion analysis and the reductive perturbation method, while considering third- and fourth-order nonlinearities, the electromechanical area-density pulse propagation is investigated, leading to the generation of a localized Appulse. Accordingly, the analytical theory uses a perturbative technique, and a damped cubic–quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation is derived, which admits a single-pulse-type solitary solution that possesses different phase characteristics of the typical neuronal Appulse structure, representative of nerve impulse profiles. A modulational instability (MI) analysis demonstrates the increase of the modulation gain in the system with increasing fourth-order nonlinearity, indicating that the higher-order nonlinearities influence the MI in the proposed extended soliton model. Furthermore, a numerical analysis is performed, and consistent agreement with the analytical prediction is achieved, confirming a localized typical longitudinal single pulse-like solitary wave solution for the extended soliton model. Importantly, the appearance of a typical longitudinal single-solitary pulse-type structure can evolve uniformly with increasing fourth-order nonlinearity, leading to the splitting of the single-pulse-soliton signal and resulting in the appearance of a double asymmetric localized pulse-like mode or bisoliton-pulse structure, characteristic of a coupled Appulse.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1063/5.0233543
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.