Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with Modified Weaver–Dunn Operation Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft Comparative Study

Abstract

Abstract Background: The dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is recognized as one of the most frequently occurring injuries most often after either direct or indirect force is applied to the affected shoulder. The best method of AC reconstruction is still controversial. Modified Weaver–Dunn operation (WD) is one of the popular operations. Recent ACJ reconstruction methods include the usage of the gracilis, semitendinosus auto grafts, synthetic grafts, end buttons, nonabsorbable sutures, suture anchors, and tight-rope system. Aim and Objectives: Clinical and radiological results of hamstring autograft versus modified WD operation for reconsrtuction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments. Patients and Methods: This prospective study was carried out at the orthopedic department of Benha University Hospital carried out on 30 cases with chronic ACJ dislocation. They divided into two groups. The modified WD technique was employed on 15 patients, whereas an autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft was used on the other 15. There was a comparison of radiographs taken before and after surgery. Results: Mean surgical time and coracoclavicular (CC) distance differed statistically between groups. Neither demographic data nor postoperative information (pain, range of motion, and postop) showed a difference of statistical significance between the groups. Constant score and post operative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) and post operative complications show no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Both AC and CC reconstruction by hamstring tendon autograft showed good-to-excellent outcomes with no implant-related complications as some other treatment methods, also more anatomical procedure more than WD operation with better biomechanical vertical and horizontal stability.