MARATTO

article · Journal of The Arab Society for Medical Research

Acoustic speech analysis of CAD/CAM and conventional Kennedy class IV removable partial dentures

Abstract

Background/aim Phonetics is an important function of the oral cavity that can be affected by partial or total loss of teeth. This study aimed to examine the influence of the partial denture’s construction technique (conventional and CAD/CAM) on speech quality through acoustic analysis of sound production of letters S, Sh, T, and D using sound analysis software. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 20 patients aged from 25 to 50 years having maxillary anterior teeth loss (Kennedy class IV classification). The patients were randomly categorized into two groups: group I received conventional removable partial dentures (RPDs), while group II received CAD/CAM RPDs. Acoustic speech analysis of the selected letters (S, Sh, T, and D) of the delivered RPDs was assessed and analyzed using ANSYS sound software and SIL speech Analyzer, 1 and 3 months after denture insertion. Statistical analysis was carried out using paired t test and independent t test. Results Group II showed significant difference ( P <0.05) in the acoustic pronunciation of the selected letters, in the follow-up period from denture insertion to 1 month after, while for the follow-up period from denture insertion to 3 months there was insignificant difference ( P >0.05) in the acoustic pronunciation of the S, Sh, and T sound compared to group I. Within group I and group II separately, they revealed significant difference for all the measured parameters except for VOT/(D) which was insignificantly different. Conclusion RPDs constructed by CAD/CAM technology have a more precise fit of the chrome–cobalt framework with a high quality of sound production even at the time of denture insertion.

Research topics

  • Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Dental Radiography and Imaging

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/jasmr.jasmr_15_22

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.