article · Benha Medical Journal
Background: The most frequent ailment requiring immediate surgical intervention is acute appendicitis. Up to 20% of patients had appendicular perforation, which raises the death and morbidity rates from 3% to 47%. Consequently, even in situations when there is even a low degree of suspicion, the appendix is routinely removed, which results in needless surgery for up to 40% of patients.Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha appendicitis(RIPASA)scoring systems of acute appendicitis in correlation with intra-operative findings.Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 193 patients with acute appendicitis. All items of RIPASA score were reported with a cut off value of 7.5 and correlated to the postoperative histopathology. Results: Mean RIPASA Score was 10.2 ± 2.3. 9.85% were negative histologically for acute appendicitis. True positive was 170 cases. True Negative cases were 13. The sensitivity of RIPASA score was 96.5%, while the specificity was 76.4%. Diagnostic Accuracy was 94.8%. Conclusion: The RIPASA score is an accurate, practicable, and reliable diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis (AA) that also has a high sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy. Using a RIPASA score as a reliable diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis (AA), in Egyptians is possible when using a cutoff value of 7.5.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/bmfj.2024.249337.1953
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.